In spite of the rapid advances made in the area of real-time PCR detection chemistries and instrumentation, end-point RT-PCR still remains a very commonly used technique for measuring changes in gene-expression in small sample numbers.
End-point RT-PCR can be used to measure changes in expression levels using three different methods: relative, competitive and comparative. The most commonly used procedures for quantitating end-point RT-PCR results rely on detecting a fluorescent dye such as ethidium bromide, or quantitation of P
32-labeled PCR product by a phosphorimager or, to a lesser extent, by scintillation counting.
Relative quantitation compares transcript abundance across multiple samples, using a co-amplified internal control for sample normalization. Results are expressed as ratios of the gene-specific signal to the internal control signal. This yields a corrected relative value for the gene-specific product in each sample. These values may be compared between samples for an estimate of the relative expression of target RNA in the samples; for example, 2.5-fold more IL-12 in sample 2 than in sample 1.
Absolute quantitation, using competitive RT-PCR, measures the absolute amount (e.g., 5.3 x 10
5 copies) of a specific mRNA sequence in a sample. Dilutions of a synthetic RNA (identical in sequence, but slightly shorter than the endogenous target) are added to sample RNA replicates and are co-amplified with the endogenous target. The PCR product from the endogenous transcript is then compared to the concentration curve created by the synthetic "competitor RNA."
Comparative RT-PCR mimics competitive RT-PCR in that target message from each RNA sample competes for amplification reagents within a single reaction, making the technique reliably quantitative. Because the cDNA from both samples have the same PCR primer binding site, one sample acts as a competitor for the other, making it unnecessary to synthesize a competitor RNA sequence.
Both relative and competitive RT-PCR quantitation techniques require pilot experiments. In the case of relative RT-PCR, pilot experiments include selection of a quantitation method and determination of the exponential range of amplification for each mRNA under study. For competitive RT-PCR, a synthetic RNA competitor transcript must be synthesized and used in pilot experiments to determine the appropriate range for the standard curve. Comparative RT-PCR yields similar sensitivity as relative and competitive RT-PCR, but requires significantly less optimization and does not require synthesis of a competitor.
Relative RT-PCR Relative RT-PCR uses primers for an internal control that are multiplexed in the same RT-PCR reaction with the gene specific primers. Internal control and gene-specific primers must be compatible — that is, they must not produce additional bands or hybridize to each other. The expression of the internal control should be constant across all samples being analyzed. Then the signal from the internal control can used to normalize sample data to account for tube-to-tube differences caused by variable RNA quality or RT efficiency, inaccurate quantitation or pipetting. Common internal controls include ß-actin and GAPDH mRNAs and 18S rRNA. Unlike Northerns and nuclease protection assays, where an internal control probe is simply added to the experiment, the use of internal controls in relative RT-PCR requires substantial optimization.
For relative RT-PCR data to be meaningful, the PCR reaction must be terminated when the products from both the internal control and the gene of interest are detectable and are being amplified within exponential phase (see
Determining Exponential Range in PCR). Because internal control RNAs are typically constituitively expressed housekeeping genes of high abundance, their amplification surpasses exponential phase with very few PCR cycles. It is therefore difficult to identify compatible exponential phase conditions where the PCR product from a rare message is detectable. Detection methods with low sensitivity, like ethidium bromide staining of agarose gels, are therefore not recommended. Detecting a rare message while staying in exponential range with an abundant message can be achieved several ways: 1) by increasing the sensitivity of product detection, 2) by decreasing the amount of input template in the RT or PCR reactions and/or 3) by decreasing the number of PCR cycles.
Ambion recommends using 18S rRNA as an internal control because it shows less variance in expression across treatment conditions than ß-actin and GAPDH. However, because of its abundance, it is difficult to detect the PCR product for rare messages in the exponential phase of amplification of 18S rRNA. Ambion's patented Competimer™ Technology solves this problem by attenuating the 18S rRNA signal even to the level of rare messages. Attenuation results from the use of competimers — primers identical in sequence to the functional 18S rRNA primers but that are "blocked" at their 3'-end and, thus, cannot be extended by PCR. Competimers and primers are mixed at various ratios to reduce the amount of PCR product generated from 18S rRNA. Figure 1 illustrates that 18S rRNA primers without competimers cannot be used as an internal control because the 18S rRNA amplification overwhelms that of clathrin (compare panels A and B). Mixing primers with competimers at a 3:7 ratio attenuates the 18S rRNA signal, making 18S rRNA a practical internal control (panel C).
上一篇：RT-PCR专题 下一篇：Equipment And Reagents For Real-Time PCR
共7页: 上一页 [1] [2] [3] 4 [5] [6] [7] 下一页
